This video features Dean Withers engaging in a series of debates with various individuals, predominantly self-identified Trump supporters. The primary purpose is to discuss and dissect different viewpoints on Donald Trump's presidency and related political issues, including the border, the economy, and abortion. The debates frequently become heated and confrontational.
Donald Trump's behavior: A significant portion of the discussion revolves around audio clips of Donald Trump admitting to entering beauty pageant dressing rooms while contestants were undressed, sparking a debate on whether this constitutes "perving." Different interpretations emerge, highlighting contrasting moral perspectives and the impact of context.
Immigration policy: The effectiveness and morality of Trump's immigration policies are debated, particularly concerning border security and the root causes of undocumented immigration. Different perspectives on the balance between border control and providing pathways to legal immigration are explored.
Economic policies: The economic impact of Trump's policies, particularly the "Big Beautiful Bill," is discussed. Different interpretations and data sources are used to evaluate the effect on income inequality and the overall economy.
Abortion: The ethical considerations surrounding abortion are a central theme. The definition of murder and the concept of bodily autonomy are debated, with varying viewpoints presented on the circumstances under which abortion should be permissible.
Debate Dynamics: The video demonstrates the often contentious and emotionally charged nature of political discourse. The host's approach to moderating and engaging with guests with opposing viewpoints is a recurring point of observation and discussion.
The first 30 minutes of the video primarily focus on a debate between Dean Withers and Darien, a Trump supporter. The debate centers around a series of audio clips featuring Donald Trump discussing his actions backstage at Miss Teen USA and Miss USA pageants. Dean argues that Trump's actions constitute "perving" on underage girls and women, while Darien attempts to defend Trump, initially claiming the clip didn't mention underage girls and later suggesting Trump's ownership of the pageants justified his presence backstage. The debate becomes increasingly heated and contentious, with Dean repeatedly playing the audio clip and Darien offering various counterarguments that Dean refutes. The conversation includes numerous analogies and hypothetical scenarios to illustrate the differing perspectives on Trump's behavior and the concept of "perving." Darien's arguments are consistently challenged by Dean, leading to a significant disagreement about the interpretation of Trump’s actions and their ethical implications. The tone is highly confrontational and personal, with frequent interruptions and accusations from both sides. The first 30 minutes do not move beyond this initial debate.
Here's a transcription of the first 30 minutes of the video. Note that due to the length of the original transcript, some minor formatting inconsistencies may remain. The timestamps are preserved as they were originally provided.
[{"start_ms":"160","end_ms":"5359","text":"you know he lied about that too you can't lie you know so it's just I guess","start_time_text":"0:00"},{"start_ms":"5359","end_ms":"11519","text":"they're both really evil but I mean to me like the Republican party is more family oriented and they're more","start_time_text":"0:05"},{"start_ms":"11519","end_ms":"16640","text":"pro-life even though I don't consider myself a Republican hello and welcome in to","start_time_text":"0:11"},{"start_ms":"16640","end_ms":"23119","text":"everybody tuning in on the YouTube stream i bet you could take a good guess why I decided to start my stream in the middle of that last guy's speech i'm","start_time_text":"0:16"},{"start_ms":"23119","end_ms":"29359","text":"glad you caught the end there uh as you can tell we're not going to spare a second we're going to hop right into the debates this guy's name is Darien and","start_time_text":"0:23"},{"start_ms":"29359","end_ms":"35680","text":"we're already in the middle of a conversation now the reason why I started my live on YouTube is because he's arguing that Donald Trump is a good","start_time_text":"0:29"},{"start_ms":"35680","end_ms":"40879","text":"family man right um so I mean I just kind of want to rehash the facts so uh","start_time_text":"0:35"},{"start_ms":"40879","end_ms":"47360","text":"do good family men perve on naked teenagers and then talk about how beautiful their naked bodies are there","start_time_text":"0:40"},{"start_ms":"47360","end_ms":"52640","text":"is that something that good family men do no no okay well remember when I played you that clip maybe 3 minutes ago","start_time_text":"0:47"},{"start_ms":"52640","end_ms":"60079","text":"of him admitting to doing that you you he nowhere in that video did he say that there was little girls so teen So this","start_time_text":"0:52"},{"start_ms":"60079","end_ms":"65198","text":"was at Miss Teen USA so he owned a handful of pageantss one of them was Miss Teen USA and in this clip he talks","start_time_text":"1:00"},{"start_ms":"65199","end_ms":"70720","text":"about going backstage before the event into their changing room where there were no men and looking at them while","start_time_text":"1:05"},{"start_ms":"70720","end_ms":"75760","text":"they're naked with no clothes on um and this happened to Miss Teen USA and at Miss USA i mean like we even have the","start_time_text":"1:10"},{"start_ms":"75760","end_ms":"84080","text":"testimony of the teen replay that clip again all right replay that clip again because I'm not I'm I'm not Replay that","start_time_text":"1:15"},{"start_ms":"84080","end_ms":"90240","text":"clip again if you can please how can it not be construed no I mean I mean some of these foreign girls you know Mr trump","start_time_text":"1:24"},{"start_ms":"90240","end_ms":"97200","text":"in my country we say hello with vagina and Well you could also say as the owner of the pageant it's your obligation to","start_time_text":"1:30"},{"start_ms":"97200","end_ms":"102799","text":"do that so So you have done that tell me well I'll tell you the funniest is that I'll go backstage before show and","start_time_text":"1:37"},{"start_ms":"102799","end_ms":"108399","text":"everyone's getting talking about a little kids pageant and the guy is mentioning a vagina","start_time_text":"1:42"},{"start_ms":"108399","end_ms":"114000","text":"yeah so this is Miss Teen USA and Miss USA in which she did this at Yeah","start_time_text":"1:48"},{"start_ms":"114000","end_ms":"119280","text":"i don't I don't know they didn't mention anything about teens but Oh see so they said women at the end of the clip okay","start_time_text":"1:54"},{"start_ms":"119280","end_ms":"125280","text":"so do you think it's like not unacceptable at all if it's if it's not naked teenagers that he was perving on but it was naked women that he was","start_time_text":"1:59"},{"start_ms":"125280","end_ms":"131680","text":"perving on i I don't I don't I don't see that as perving on i I can I could you","start_time_text":"2:05"},{"start_ms":"131680","end_ms":"137920","text":"know I would disagree with you on that so your daughter turns 18 you take her to Kohl's i'm listen to what I'm saying","start_time_text":"2:11"},{"start_ms":"137920","end_ms":"143200","text":"here weird though the whole No no no listen to what I'm saying here your daughter turns 18 you take her to Kohl's","start_time_text":"2:17"},{"start_ms":"143200","end_ms":"150319","text":"to buy a dress she's putting it on in a changing room the floor manager of Kohl's brushes past you and sticks his","start_time_text":"2:23"},{"start_ms":"150319","end_ms":"155920","text":"head under the door of the changing room while she's naked to look at her and then later he goes on a podcast and talk","start_time_text":"2:30"},{"start_ms":"155920","end_ms":"162480","text":"talks about how beautiful she looked is that guy a perve trump isn't peeking under you're This is","start_time_text":"2:35"},{"start_ms":"162480","end_ms":"168560","text":"a completely That is a completely different scenario you You You You can't","start_time_text":"2:42"},{"start_ms":"168560","end_ms":"173959","text":"You won't catch Trump peeking under a","start_time_text":"2:48"},{"start_ms":"174720","end_ms":"180080","text":"You cut out there now you're back yeah sorry so you're saying that completely different scenario okay well let's","start_time_text":"2:54"},{"start_ms":"180080","end_ms":"186319","text":"listen to the clip together and we're going to break it down give me 30 seconds to break it down with you here well I'll tell you the funniest is that","start_time_text":"3:00"}]
No, this transcript is highly unlikely to be admissible in a family court setting. Several factors preclude its use as evidence:
Hearsay: Much of the transcript is comprised of statements made by individuals not present in court, recounting events and opinions. This constitutes hearsay and is generally inadmissible unless it falls under a recognized exception (which is unlikely here).
Lack of Verification: The statements in the transcript are largely unverified claims and opinions. The court would require authenticated evidence, such as official police reports, medical records, or witness testimony under oath, to substantiate the allegations.
Intemperate Language: The transcript contains significant amounts of profanity and inflammatory language. This is inappropriate for a formal legal setting and would likely prejudice the court against the parties using it.
Irrelevance: Much of the content is politically focused and doesn't directly relate to the issues typically handled in family court (custody, visitation, child support, etc.). Even if some parts were relevant, their probative value would be outweighed by the prejudicial and inflammatory nature of the transcript.
Lack of Context: Without the video itself, the transcript lacks crucial visual and contextual information. Tone of voice, body language, and the overall presentation of the arguments are absent, making it difficult to interpret the statements accurately.
To use any evidence in a family court case, you must present it to the court through the appropriate legal channels and ensure that it meets the standards of admissibility. You should consult with a qualified attorney to determine what evidence is relevant and admissible in your specific case. They can advise you on the proper procedures for presenting evidence and ensuring a fair outcome.
In the context of the transcript, the host, Dean Withers, states he would take a caller's daughter away as a hyperbolic expression of extreme disapproval of the caller's views. He is reacting to the caller's statements justifying Donald Trump's behavior and expressing strong disagreement with the caller's parenting style. It is not a serious threat but rather a rhetorical device used to emphasize his disapproval.
