This video is a session discussing the concept of art pricing for contemporary artists. The discussion is divided into two parts: a theoretical overview of art pricing, including its advantages and disadvantages, and a practical guide focusing on the differences between theory and practice.
What are the key differences between "officious" and "official" art pricing as explained in the video?
The video defines "officious" pricing as reflecting an artist's career progression, including exhibitions, gallery sales, and presence at art fairs. "Official" pricing, however, is determined solely by sales at auction houses. The video emphasizes that official pricing holds more weight in public perception and professional circles.
What are the two major disadvantages of having an official art price, according to the video?
The video cites two main drawbacks: first, the risk of paying for an official price (which is explicitly stated as something that should never be done); and second, the potential for artistic dependency, restricting an artist's exploration of different styles if their official price is tied to a single style or subject matter.
Which of the four mentioned art pricing organizations is considered the most important in France, and why?
Artprice is identified as the most significant in France. This is due to its long history (over 30 years), its acquisition of the prestigious Bénézit art guide's database, and the fact that 90% of French auctioneers are affiliated with it.
What is the strategy described in the video for ensuring an artwork's official price accurately reflects its market value?
The proposed method involves selling an artwork directly to a client at the desired price, then staging an auction where the artist (or someone acting on their behalf) ensures the artwork is sold at that same price, thus establishing an official market value. This method is presented as an alternative to potentially misleading pricing practices.
Ask anything...