About this Video

• Video Title: Bitcoin’s Prophecy Just Came True… $444,402.75 is Next
• Channel: Andrei Jikh
• Speakers: Andrei Jikh, Josh Mandel (mentioned)
• Duration: 00:15:50

Introduction

This video discusses a seemingly accurate Bitcoin price prediction made by Josh Mandel in November 2024. Mandel predicted Bitcoin would reach $84,000 on March 14th (Pi Day), which proved remarkably close to the actual closing price. The video explores the subsequent prediction that, if the $84,000 prediction held true, the next price target would be $444,402.75. The presenter investigates the basis of Mandel's predictions, exploring numerological patterns and a potential connection to a proposed US government Bitcoin purchase strategy.

Key Takeaways

• Accurate Prediction: Josh Mandel accurately predicted Bitcoin's price on March 14th, 2025, to be very close to $84,000.
• Subsequent Prophecy: Mandel's prediction included a subsequent price target of $444,402.75 if the first prediction proved correct.
• Numerological Patterns: Mandel's predictions appear to align with numerological patterns associated with the numbers 3, 6, and 9, a concept linked to Nikola Tesla's beliefs.
• US Government Proposal: A proposed bill in Congress suggests the US government might purchase a significant amount of Bitcoin, potentially impacting the price.
• Cautionary Note: While the presenter finds the predictions intriguing, he emphasizes the need for caution and diversification, advising against placing all investments in Bitcoin based on a single prediction.

To answer your request for more information on the US Government proposal, here's an excerpt from the transcript detailing that proposal:

Citation: "just recently Andrew hones the CEO of New Market Capital introduced the concept of bit bonds at the Bitcoin policy Institute for America event his proposal is asking that the US government issue two trillion dollar in bonds remember this is how the US government borrows money by creating bonds and it would allocate 10% of that 2 trillion that's 200 billion to buy Bitcoin and with the remaining 90% funding regular government operations now these bonds would offer an annual interest rate of 1% which is significantly lower than the current US 10-year rate of approximately 45% and this reduction could save the government $70 billion per year in interest expenses that it would have to pay to foreign governments and other investors and over 10 years that would save the United States $700 billion now after 10 years Bond holders would be entitled to get their interest plus up to 50% of bitcoin's price growth so by integrating Bitcoin into the national debt strategy the government wouldn't just diversify its Financial portfolio but it could also benefit from bitcoin's long-term growth"

This passage describes a proposal to issue $2 trillion in bonds, allocating $200 billion (10%) to purchase Bitcoin, with the remainder funding government operations. The proposal highlights potential savings on interest payments. The bondholders would also receive interest plus up to 50% of Bitcoin's price growth after 10 years. Note that this is a proposal, not a confirmed policy.

Imagine the US government needs to borrow money. Usually, it does this by selling bonds (like IOUs). This proposal suggests a new type of bond where a portion of the money borrowed would be used to buy Bitcoin.

Specifically, they'd borrow $2 trillion, use $200 billion of that to buy Bitcoin, and use the rest for regular government spending. This would save the government money on interest payments over the long term and potentially profit from Bitcoin's increase in value. Bondholders would get their initial investment back plus a share of any Bitcoin profits after 10 years. It's a way to reduce the national debt and potentially profit from Bitcoin's growth at the same time. However, this is just a suggestion – it hasn't been approved yet.

Let's break down the proposed Bitcoin bond deal from the perspectives of the US government and you, as an investor:

For the US Government:

• Needs: The government needs to borrow money to fund its operations. Issuing bonds is a common way to do this.
• Proposal: Instead of borrowing solely to cover expenses, they propose a new type of bond where a portion of the borrowed funds ($200 billion out of $2 trillion) is used to buy Bitcoin.
• Benefits:
  • Reduced Interest Payments: The new bonds would offer a lower interest rate than traditional bonds, saving the government billions in interest payments over time.
  • Potential Bitcoin Profits: The government would benefit if the price of Bitcoin rises, potentially increasing the value of its Bitcoin holdings.
  • Debt Diversification: Owning Bitcoin would diversify the government's assets beyond traditional investments.
• Risks: The price of Bitcoin could fall, resulting in losses for the government.

For You, the Investor:

• Investment: You'd be lending money to the government by purchasing these bonds.
• Returns:
  • Interest: You'd receive a relatively low interest rate (1% annually) compared to standard government bonds.
  • Potential Bitcoin Profits: After 10 years, you'd get your initial investment back plus a share of the profits the government makes from its Bitcoin investment (up to 50%).
• Benefits:
  • Lower Risk (potentially): Although risky, the low interest rate on the bond acts as a form of insurance, mitigating the risk of total Bitcoin loss. There's also a guaranteed return of your principal.
  • High Potential Return (potentially): If Bitcoin's price increases significantly, you could potentially receive a substantially higher return than the low interest rate suggests.
• Risks:
  • Low Interest Rate: The interest earned is considerably less than what traditional bonds might offer.
  • Bitcoin Price Volatility: The price of Bitcoin could drop significantly, impacting the overall return after 10 years, and even potentially reducing the principal amount returned.

In short: The government is betting on Bitcoin’s growth to offset lower interest payments. You're accepting a lower guaranteed return in exchange for a chance to share in potential Bitcoin profits after a 10-year period. Both parties face risks. This is a complex financial strategy with significant uncertainties.

The video suggests that Josh Mandel's Bitcoin price predictions exhibit a pattern related to the numbers 3, 6, and 9. This is presented as a connection to Nikola Tesla's alleged fascination with these numbers, implying a possible mystical or numerological significance. However, it's crucial to understand that numerology is not a scientifically validated concept. It's a belief system that assigns meaning to numbers based on their symbolic value, not on empirical evidence or mathematical principles.

Is the numerological pattern a scientific concept? No. There's no scientific basis for claiming that numbers inherently possess mystical properties that predict future events. Correlation does not equal causation; the fact that numbers in Mandel's predictions might reduce to 3, 6, or 9 doesn't mean there's a causal relationship to the price of Bitcoin. It's a matter of interpretation and subjective pattern recognition.

Other examples where numerological patterns might be claimed to apply (but without scientific support):

• Birthdates and Personality: Numerology is often used to suggest personality traits based on someone's birthdate, reducing the date to a single digit and associating it with specific characteristics. This is entirely subjective.
• Lottery Numbers: People might attempt to find patterns in lottery numbers based on numerology, believing it might increase their chances of winning. This is statistically unfounded; lottery numbers are randomly selected.
• Historical Events: Some might try to find numerological patterns in dates of historical events, claiming these numbers hold significance and can predict future events. Again, this is a subjective interpretation lacking scientific evidence.

It's important to be critical when encountering claims based on numerology. While the numbers 3, 6, and 9 might appear in Mandel's predictions and have an intriguing connection to Tesla's beliefs, this is insufficient evidence to suggest a real predictive capability. The occurrence of these numbers could be purely coincidental, and attributing predictive power to them is a form of confirmation bias.