David Seymour on division, ‘dropkicks’ and working with Winston

About this video

• Video Title: David Seymour on division, ‘dropkicks’ and working with Winston
• Channel: The Spinoff
• Speakers: Toby Manhire, David Seymour
• Duration: 31:59

Overview

This video is an interview with David Seymour, leader of the ACT party, conducted by Toby Manhire for "At Large with Toby Manhire." The discussion covers Seymour's political career, his party's performance, his views on the Treaty Principles Bill, electoral reform, coalition dynamics, and economic policies. Seymour also addresses his past remarks and his approach to various political issues.

Key takeaways

• ACT Party's Growth and Coalition Role: David Seymour discusses leading the ACT party from a small percentage to achieving consecutive terms in parliament and their current position as a "stable peg" in the coalition government.
• Treaty Principles Bill and National Debate: Seymour defends his approach to the Treaty Principles Bill, arguing that open debate on the foundational documents of New Zealand is essential for the country's future, even if it causes discomfort. He believes this debate is necessary to resolve fundamental disagreements about the nation's identity and move forward.
• Electoral System and Voter Responsibility: Seymour expresses his strong belief that individuals have a responsibility to be enrolled to vote and participate in the democratic process, equating those who neglect this basic duty to "dropkicks." He links this to the importance of jury service and the integrity of electoral rolls.
• Working with Coalition Partners: He reflects on his experience working within the coalition government, particularly with Winston Peters, whom he previously criticized. Seymour highlights the ACT party's achievements in government and their constructive approach despite internal coalition dynamics.
• Economic Policies and Market Regulation: Seymour critiques the government's spending and borrowing, advocating for more rapid spending cuts. He discusses the abuse of market power, emphasizing the need for enforcing existing laws rather than relying on politicians to dictate market structures, and expresses concern about policies that may deter investment in New Zealand.