About this video

• Video Title: Debunking Elden Ring's Worst Theory...
• Channel: Jack is a Mimic
• Speakers: Jack (presumably the creator)
• Duration: 1:18:34

Overview

This video critically examines and debunks the popular theory that a specific statue in Elden Ring depicts Godfrey, the first Elden Lord. The creator argues that this interpretation is incorrect and delves deep into the game's lore, item descriptions, and dialogue to establish a more accurate timeline and understanding of key events, including the Night of Black Knives, the Shattering, and the nature of demigods. The primary goal is to correct the timeline of these events and reveal who the statue truly represents.

Key takeaways

• The Statue is Not Godfrey: Contrary to popular belief, the statue in question does not depict Godfrey, the first Elden Lord. The video aims to prove who it actually represents.
• Misinterpreting the Timeline: A common misunderstanding of when key events like the Night of Black Knives and the Shattering occurred has led to flawed theories about characters like Godfrey and Godwin.
• Ranni's Narrative vs. In-Game Lore: The video analyzes Ranni's in-game dialogue and trailer narration, suggesting it may be biased or incomplete, and contrasts it with information gathered from item descriptions and other in-game sources.
• The True Timeline of Events: The video proposes a revised timeline, asserting that the Night of Black Knives happened during the Golden Age of the Erdtree, long before the Shattering, and that Godfrey was the Elden Lord at that time.
• Demigod Definition: The video clarifies the evolving definition of "demigod" within the game's lore, explaining that it initially referred to Godfrey and his lineage but later expanded to include children of Marika and Radagon.
• The Role of Prophecy: The creator emphasizes the importance of understanding prophecy within Elden Ring's lore, arguing that many misinterpreted prophecies have led to the community's misconceptions.
• The True Identity of the Statue: While the video aims to definitively identify the statue, the provided transcript ends before a full reveal, focusing instead on debunking the Godfrey theory and establishing the corrected timeline and lore.

The creator's main argument against the theory that the statue depicts Godfrey is based on a chronological analysis of in-game lore. The video posits that if the statue were of Godfrey, it would contradict the established timeline of events, particularly the Night of Black Knives and the subsequent Shattering. By meticulously examining item descriptions and character dialogues, the creator aims to demonstrate that the events and character roles associated with the time period suggested by the statue's context do not align with Godfrey's known history as the first Elden Lord. The video suggests that the statue actually represents someone else based on this timeline discrepancy.

The creator intends to reveal who the statue actually depicts, stating early in the video, "So, in order to prove this statue isn't Godwin, we have to prove who it is." However, the provided transcript cuts off before a definitive identification is made. The video focuses heavily on debunking the Godfrey theory and establishing a corrected timeline and lore to support the eventual reveal, but the actual identity of the statue is not explicitly stated within this transcript.