About this video

• Video Title: Het definitieve begin van een nieuwe wereldorde?
• Channel: Nieuwsuur
• Speakers: Not explicitly mentioned, but includes expert commentary and interviews.
• Duration: 23:09

Overview

This video explores whether recent geopolitical events, particularly US actions in Venezuela, signal the beginning of a new world order. It examines the historical context of American foreign policy, China's rising influence as an alternative global model, and Russia's diminished role in international power dynamics. The analysis includes perspectives from historians, political scientists, and economists on the shifting global landscape.

Key takeaways

• Shifting Global Power Dynamics: The video suggests that the US's assertive actions, reminiscent of historical interventions, might be challenging the existing liberal international order and creating space for alternative models, particularly China's.
• US Imperialism and the Monroe Doctrine: The resurgence of the Monroe Doctrine as a justification for US actions in Venezuela is highlighted, drawing parallels to a long history of American interventionism in Latin America.
• China's Growing Influence: China is presented as a rising power offering an alternative to the Western-led world order, focusing on economic influence and engagement with developing nations.
• Russia's Diminished Role: Despite its rhetoric about a world order based on power, Russia's inability to effectively support Venezuela and its own internal challenges suggest a decline in its global standing.
• Interconnected Global Politics: Events in Venezuela have ripple effects, influencing relationships between the US, China, and Russia, and potentially impacting other regions like Ukraine.

The video suggests Russia's global influence is diminishing through several points:

• Inability to Protect Allies: Russia's support for Venezuela, in the form of money and weapons, was insufficient to protect Maduro from US actions. This is exemplified by the US seizing a Russian-flagged oil tanker, which a Russian submarine escort could not prevent.
• Political Setback: Experts view the events in Venezuela as a significant political loss for Russia, potentially greater than any economic loss from oil investments.
• Failed Intervention Plans: Russia's plan to intervene in a similar manner as the US in Venezuela was stymied by its ongoing conflict in Ukraine, which has bogged down its resources and military for years.
• Undermining Authority: Trump's actions against Maduro are seen as directly undermining the authority and image of the Russian Federation.
• Blogger and Expert Commentary: Russian bloggers and experts express disappointment and concern, noting that Russia has "stumbled over its own rake" and that friendly regimes are collapsing, indicating a perceived weakening of Russia's position.
• Limited Global Standing: One expert suggests Russia is not "big enough" to be considered a distinct third global power bloc in the same way as China and the US, implying it is seen as secondary in the current geopolitical landscape.

The video mentions a leaked transcript from 2019 where Fiona Hill testified to Congress about a proposed "trade deal" by the Russians. The essence of this proposal was:

"You want us out of your backyard. We have our own version. You are in our backyard in Ukraine."

Essentially, Russia was suggesting a quid pro quo: if the US wanted Russia out of its sphere of influence (implied to be Latin America, specifically Venezuela), then Russia expected the US to also step back from Russia's sphere of influence, which was identified as Ukraine.