This video analyzes Bryan Johnson's self-proclaimed "best biomarkers in the world" claim by comparing them to the speaker's own biomarker test results. The speaker meticulously compares over 65 biomarkers across various health categories, ultimately concluding that while Johnson's results are above average, they are not the best globally, and the speaker's own biomarkers are superior in numerous areas.
Here are the answers based on the provided transcript:
The speaker had better results than Bryan Johnson in 44 out of the 65 biomarker categories analyzed.
The speaker attributes Bryan Johnson's suboptimal kidney function to several factors: high levels of exercise (possibly excessively high), elevated B12 and folate levels (indicating potential issues with kidney filtration), low protein status, and possibly unknown factors related to his supplementation or pharmaceuticals (e.g., lithium).
The speaker's average blood glucose level was 81 mg/dL while consuming 300 grams of carbohydrates daily. Bryan Johnson's average was 91 mg/dL. The speaker notes that their significantly lower triglycerides despite higher carbohydrate intake illustrates superior metabolic health.
The speaker's PhenoAge is 18.5 years lower than their chronological age. Bryan Johnson's PhenoAge is 8.81 years lower than his chronological age. The speaker highlights a more than 10-year difference between their PhenoAge results.
