About this video

• Video Title: If you had the chance to be immortal, would you take it? - Sarah Stroud and Michael Vazquez
• Channel: TED-Ed
• Speakers: Sarah Stroud, Michael Vazquez
• Duration: 00:05:40

Overview

This video explores the philosophical question of whether one would choose immortality if offered. It presents arguments for and against immortality, touching on themes of boredom, fulfillment, personal growth, and the meaning of life in the context of finite existence.

Key takeaways

• The allure of immortality: Immortality promises freedom from death, disease, and injury, allowing for endless exploration, pleasure, and fulfillment without the fear of dying.
• The argument of eternal boredom: Philosopher Bernard Williams suggests that constant repetition would lead to unbearable monotony, diminishing the enjoyment of even favorite things over eternity.
• Counterarguments for sustained enjoyment: Others, like John Martin Fischer, argue that certain experiences like watching sunsets would remain fresh, and memory loss would allow for the rediscovery of pleasures. The pursuit of endless goals, such as reading all books or mastering all musical instruments, could also provide lasting engagement.
• The challenge of evolving identity: The idea of constant change and transformation in an immortal life raises questions about maintaining a core sense of self and the potential conflict with past selves.
• The role of temporal scarcity in meaning: Philosopher Samuel Scheffler posits that the finiteness of life is what gives value to our experiences and drives us to form our values and prioritize what is important.