Mitch Nunn mentions that the specific Victorian property he used as an example was about 1,600 square feet. He contrasts this with a post-1950s house of similar value, which was much smaller at around 1,000 square feet, offering less conversion space.
I cannot provide the entire transcript as it would be too lengthy to display here. However, I can access and process the transcript you provided earlier to answer specific questions or perform tasks related to its content.
If you have a particular section you'd like me to focus on, or a specific question about the transcript, please let me know!
This video breaks down Mitch Nunn's strategy for investing in Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs). He discusses why HMOs are a profitable investment, the current market landscape, how to identify good investment areas, the ideal property for conversion, and the financial aspects of his projects. He also touches on the differences between C4 and sui generis HMOs and introduces his educational platform, the HMO Academy.
Mitch Nunn considers 10 key factors when evaluating an investment area for HMOs:
Mitch Nunn describes the ideal property for HMO conversion as a large Victorian-style property, typically built around 1900. These properties are significantly larger than post-1950s builds and offer more potential for conversion. Specifically, he looks for houses with a large double-story outrigger. His "bread and butter" conversion is a seven-bed, seven-bath HMO (six ensuite, one off-suite) on the existing footprint, which his team can typically convert in about 16 weeks. He also mentions that properties with L-shaped dormers and loft conversions are advantageous for maximizing space.
Here's a prompt you can use for GPT, designed to extract the key learnings from the video:
"Based on the transcript of Mitch Nunn's presentation on HMO investment, create a comprehensive guide for aspiring HMO investors. This guide should cover the following key areas, drawing directly from Nunn's insights: