This video analyzes scientific evidence to determine whether calf training is worthwhile. It examines research on calf muscle growth, considering factors like protein synthesis and fiber types, to conclude whether the effort invested in calf training yields significant results.
The video mentions several studies with varying conclusions regarding calf muscle growth:
Study 1 (Japan): Calves increased in size by 2-6%, less than observed in triceps and hamstrings. However, the Soleus showed less growth than the Gastrocnemius, which showed growth comparable to hamstrings.
Study 2 (USA): Absolute and relative changes in calf size (particularly the Gastrocnemius) were comparable to quadriceps gains.
Study 3 (Brazil): Calf growth was observed, with the Soleus showing significant growth similar to biceps and brachialis growth in a separate study using similar subjects and training.
Study 4 (Norway): Medial Gastrocnemius grew similarly to quadriceps in another study with the same subjects and similar training.
Study 5 (Germany): Medial and lateral Gastrocnemius grew comparably to pectoralis major growth in a separate study with similar subjects and training.
The overall conclusion drawn from the collection of studies is that while some studies showed slightly less calf growth than other muscle groups, other studies demonstrated comparable or even superior growth, depending on the specific muscle head and training program. The range of growth observed spanned from approximately 2% to 23%. Therefore the evidence on calf growth is mixed, and further research is needed for definitive conclusions.
The video's recommendation is that calf training is worthwhile. While some studies showed less calf growth than other muscle groups, many studies showed comparable or even superior growth, and highly trained individuals showed significant growth with dedicated calf training. The overall conclusion is that calves can respond robustly to training and therefore the effort is worthwhile.