Yes, Jonathan Blow mentions Zig at the following timemark:
This video features a conversation between Richard Feldman and Jonathan Blow, focusing on the design principles and considerations behind programming languages, particularly Blow's own language. They discuss topics such as metaprogramming, compile-time execution, language feature interoperability, memory safety, performance, dependency management, and the philosophy of language design for expert users versus broader accessibility.
Based on the transcript, Jonathan Blow speaks positively about:
It's important to note that while he discusses these languages, his primary focus is on the design decisions and trade-offs, rather than declaring any single language as "the best." His own language is being designed with specific goals in mind, informed by his experiences with others.
Jonathan Blow talks about Rust at these timemarks:
Based on the transcript, Jonathan Blow's mention of Zig is brief and primarily in the context of discussing memory management and the broader landscape of systems programming languages. He doesn't go into extensive detail about his specific thoughts on Zig itself, but he groups it with languages that offer more manual control over memory.
Here's what can be inferred:
He doesn't offer a strong critique or endorsement of Zig specifically, but its inclusion suggests he sees it as a relevant player in the space of modern systems programming languages that aim for high performance and control.