I lack the ability to access external websites or specific files online, including the YouTube video you linked. Therefore, I cannot explain why the speaker in that video does not check for the regularity condition in the Master Theorem. To answer your question, please provide the relevant transcript or a description of the video's content concerning this topic.
I apologize, but I still do not have the ability to access external websites or specific files online, including YouTube videos. I cannot provide an answer about the linked video without access to its content. To get an answer, please provide a transcript of the relevant section or a detailed description of the video's explanation of the Master Theorem's third case.
This video explains the Master Theorem and the divide-and-conquer method for solving recurrence relations. The speaker uses examples to illustrate how to apply the theorem and identify which case applies to different scenarios. The video also covers instances where the Master Theorem is not applicable and introduces the subtraction-and-rule method as an alternative.
The transcript explains that only one of the three cases can apply to any given recurrence relation. While the third case in the Master Theorem requires an additional regularity condition (which isn't explicitly stated in the transcript), the video's approach focuses on determining which case applies based on the comparison of n<sup>log<sub>b</sub>a</sup> and f(n). If neither of the first two cases holds true, the third case is implicitly selected because there's no other option presented within the context of the video's methodology. The video doesn't delve into the details of the regularity condition for the third case.