This interview explores Nishanth Selvalingam's eclectic spiritual journey, encompassing Western philosophy, Christianity, Kashmir Shaivism, and the Sri Ramakrishna lineage. The conversation delves into the nature of realization, the reconciliation of diverse spiritual paths, the role of the guru, and ethical considerations within spiritual communities.
Multiple Paths, One Reality: Different spiritual paths lead to valid expressions of the same ultimate reality, likened to different ways of experiencing the same divine "elephant." Realization isn't a singular endpoint but a continuous journey of self-exploration.
Bhava vs. Tattva: The distinction between bhava (experiential mood or state) and tattva (ultimate reality) highlights that complete understanding of the whole reality might not be necessary for fulfillment; experiencing a single facet can bring profound realization.
Direct vs. Progressive Paths: Both direct (innate divinity) and progressive (gradual development) spiritual paths are valid, ideally integrated. The "lottery ticket" analogy illustrates the need for action to manifest and enjoy already-possessed spiritual wealth.
The Guru's Role and Ethical Concerns: The importance of a genuine guru within the tantric tradition is emphasized, along with the caution against unethical gurus and the dangers of cult-like formations in spiritual communities. Careful discernment and a holistic approach are crucial.
Holistic Spiritual Development: A balanced approach incorporating Jnana Yoga (knowledge), Bhakti Yoga (devotion), Karma Yoga (action), and Raja Yoga (mind control) is advocated for well-rounded spiritual growth and avoids the pitfalls of unbalanced development.
Nishanth Selvalingam explains the core difference between Advaita Vedanta and Kashmir Shaivism lies in the concept of Brahman (ultimate reality) and its nature. In Advaita Vedanta, Brahman is described as Nishkriya (inactive) and Nishkama (desireless), a self-illumining principle but not a being. Kashmir Shaivism, however, views Brahman (Shiva) as possessing Vimarsha (self-reflexive awareness) and Prakasha (illumination), a self-aware being with infinite creative power (Kartritva). In essence, Advaita Vedanta portrays Brahman as an inert principle, while Kashmir Shaivism depicts it as an active, playful, and creative being. He further points out that Advaita Vedanta emphasizes Svatma-Prakasha (self-illumination) whereas Kashmir Shaivism emphasizes Vimarsha (self-reflexive awareness), a subtle yet crucial distinction. The debate hinges on whether pure consciousness can be self-aware without falling into the paradox of infinite regress.
