This video argues that feminism is not only illogical but a female supremacy movement. The speaker, a retired quantitative researcher, uses five data points and logic to support this claim. The points cover shaming, weight vs. height standards, the glass ceiling/floor disparity, selective traditionalism in dating, and the disparity in pay between male and female athletes and models.
Shaming: The speaker uses graphs to illustrate how societal standards of respect differ between men and women based on promiscuity, arguing that the current system is already equal, but feminists focus only on the negative aspects for women.
Weight vs. Height: Feminists’ acceptance of larger body types in women while still criticizing shorter men is hypocritical, as weight is controllable while height is genetic.
Glass Ceiling vs. Glass Floor: The speaker points out that while feminists often focus on the lack of women in high-paying executive positions, they ignore the overrepresentation of men in dangerous and low-paying jobs. This disparity, related to IQ distribution, is presented as naturally occurring and already equal.
Selective Traditionalism: Feminists complaining about traditional gender roles while expecting men to pay for dates is seen as hypocritical and selectively advantageous to women.
Capitalism isn’t Sexism: The speaker argues that differences in pay between male and female athletes and models are due to market forces, not sexism. The higher pay reflects the higher demand for one gender over another in those specific roles.
