This video discusses the discontinuation of the penny in the US, framing it as a metaphor for larger issues within Congress and the executive branch. John Green explores how presidential administrations can reinterpret laws to achieve policy changes, even without direct congressional action, and contrasts this with the historical gridlock and inaction of Congress.
# The End of The Penny (and of Congress??)
**Channel:** vlogbrothers
**Tag:** Historical / Political / Contextual
## Overview
* The video discusses the practical and symbolic end of the US penny, noting that it costs more to produce than its value.
* It contrasts President Obama's view that eliminating the penny required Congressional action with President Trump's administration's decision to stop minting them through executive reinterpretation.
* The situation serves as a metaphor for the decline of Congressional power and the rise of executive authority in the face of legislative gridlock.
* The video explores how vague statutes and Congressional inaction create opportunities for presidents to exercise power through executive orders and reinterpretation.
## Detailed Notes
### Key Terms & Concepts
* **Facilitate Exchange:** To make the trading of goods and services easier.
* **Utility:** The usefulness or value of something.
* **Mint:** To produce coins.
* **Statutes:** Written laws passed by a legislative body.
* **Filibuster:** A parliamentary procedure where debate is prolonged to delay or prevent a vote.
* **Executive Power:** The authority of the President to enforce laws, appoint officials, and conduct foreign policy.
* **Congressional Capacity:** The ability of Congress to effectively legislate and govern.
### The Penny's Inutility
* **Cause:** Pennies and nickels cost more to produce than their face value.
* **Effect:** They are economically inefficient and have outlived their primary purpose of facilitating transactions.
### Presidential Interpretations of Law
* **Law:** The Treasury must mint coins "necessary to meet the needs of the United States."
* **Historical/Obama Interpretation:** "Necessary" meant producing coins demanded by commercial activity. Eliminating the penny required Congressional legislation.
* **Trump Administration Interpretation:** Redefined "necessary amount" as zero, stopping penny production without Congress.
* **Reasoning:** This reinterpretation was based on the President's decision, not on repeal, minting inability, or economic demand.
### Congressional Decline & Executive Rise
* **Historical Context:** Congress was once a functional lawmaking body.
* **Mechanism of Decline:**
1. **McConnell's Strategy:** Use of the filibuster extensively to block Obama's agenda.
2. **Goal:** Make the opposition party (Obama) unable to achieve anything.
3. **Consequence:** This tactic became widespread, leading to Congressional paralysis.
* **Result:** Congress gained the power only to **stop** things, becoming extremely weak.
* **Executive Opportunity:** When statutes are vague or Congress is paralyzed, the President can act.
* **Method:** Find "wiggle room" in laws, take action, and let courts decide legality later.
* **Example:** Trump's actions on tariffs and food stamps, and the penny.
### Modern Governance
* **Sole Functioning Mechanism:** Large, "must-pass" spending packages (like the Inflation Reduction Act).
* **Purpose:** These bills act as "shipping containers" for an administration's policy agenda.
* **Advantage:** They are filibuster-proof, allowing governance to occur, albeit in a limited way.
### Public Perception & Controversy
* **Penny Issue:** If Obama had eliminated the penny, it would likely have been seen as an attack on democracy.
* **Trump's Action:** The same action by Trump received minimal public attention.
* **Reason:** The penny issue is less controversial now, and Trump's actions are often overshadowed by more significant executive overreaches.
### The Core Problem
* **Observation:** Congress has intentionally diminished its own power by creating structures that prevent it from acting.
* **Two Potential Futures:**
1. Congress improves its problem-solving ability.
2. An "autocrat" rises, claiming only they can fix issues due to Congressional failure.
## Feynman-Style Explanations
* **Vagueness in Laws:** Imagine a rule that says "Be quiet." What does "quiet" mean? It’s vague! Because laws can be vague like that, a President might be able to act in a way that seems reasonable under a certain interpretation, even if others would interpret it differently.
* **Congressional Paralysis:** Think of a group project where one person keeps saying "No, we can't do that!" to every idea. Eventually, the group can't get anything done, even if they wanted to. Congress, by constantly blocking things, has become like that, unable to move forward on many issues.
## Active Recall Questions
1. What is the fundamental economic problem with pennies and nickels?
2. According to the video, why do pennies no longer effectively "facilitate exchange"?
3. How did President Obama believe the penny could be eliminated?
4. What legal basis did President Trump's administration use to stop minting pennies?
5. Define "statute" in the context of this video.
6. Explain the "cause and effect" relationship between the filibuster strategy and Congressional paralysis.
7. What does the video mean by "Congressional capacity"?
8. Describe the method President Trump's administration used to implement policy changes like stopping penny production.
9. What is the primary legislative mechanism that still functions effectively in modern US governance, according to the video?
10. How does the video suggest public reaction to the penny issue differed based on which president was involved?
11. What is the significance of the "necessary" clause in the law regarding coin production?
12. Why did Congress "intentionally" shrink its ability to wield power, according to the speaker?
13. What are the two distinct paths the video suggests could result from Congress's current state of weakness?
14. How does the video compare the "controversy" of eliminating the penny under Obama versus Trump?
15. Explain the analogy of "shipping containers" in relation to modern legislation.
16. What is the core criticism leveled against Congress regarding its current power dynamic with the presidency?
17. How does the video suggest vague statutes empower the presidency?
18. Turn this video into a tweet...