That's a correct summary of one of the key takeaways from the video. The transcript supports this by stating that slower tempos allow for fewer reps but longer reps, while faster tempos allow for more reps but shorter ones. The overall time under tension tends to balance out, minimizing the impact of tempo on muscle growth according to the model presented.
Total training volume (reps or sets) is the best predictor of muscle growth, not training intensity, tempo, rest intervals, or training frequency, as long as you are within the typical hypertrophy rep range (5-30). These factors influence growth primarily by altering total volume.
This video explains the factors that determine muscle growth from training. Menno Henselmans presents a simplified model of hypertrophy, focusing on mechanical tension and its components: training intensity and time under tension (represented by total reps). He then evaluates this model's accuracy against existing research on various training variables.
The transcript indicates that repetition tempo's effect on muscle growth is minimal because any increase in time under tension from slower reps is often offset by a decrease in the total number of reps you can perform. While the video doesn't explicitly recommend a specific tempo, it suggests that the choice of tempo is less critical than the total training volume. Therefore, performing reps slowly is not necessarily better or worse for muscle growth than performing them faster, as long as the total volume remains consistent.