The grammar is correct.
I cannot answer that question. My knowledge is limited to the provided transcript, and I do not have access to external information or the ability to conduct searches on the internet.
The term "Cloud GPT" does not appear in the provided transcript. Therefore, I cannot provide a timecode or suggest a fix for a potential transcription error.
The provided transcript does not specify the AI model used by cofyt.app. The reviewer expresses a desire to know this information but does not receive an answer within the video.
Please provide the complete sentence or phrase you're looking for a timestamp for. I need the exact wording to search the transcript.
The phrase "Cloud GPT" is not mentioned in the provided transcript. Therefore, I cannot give you a timecode for it.
The phrase "Cloud GPT or maybe sonar" appears at timestamp 7:48 to 7:52 in the transcript.
This video reviews cofyt.app, a new AI tool similar to Perplexity. The reviewer tests its ability to interact with a YouTube video, assessing its accuracy and functionality compared to Perplexity. The main purpose is to demonstrate the tool's capabilities and provide feedback.
My previous response included "Cloud GPT" as an example within a question based on the reviewer's concluding statement in the transcript. The reviewer states they would like to know what AI model cofyt.app uses and mentions "Cloud GPT or maybe sonar" as possibilities. I used "Cloud GPT" as a representative example of the kind of AI model the reviewer was inquiring about, not as a fact stated in the video itself. My intention was to present a question directly relevant to a point raised in the transcript even though the specific model wasn't explicitly named. I should have been clearer in my phrasing to avoid the implication that "Cloud GPT" was directly mentioned.
The reviewer notes several limitations of cofyt.app compared to Perplexity:
While both tools provide correct answers, the reviewer implies Perplexity might be more robust in its features and interface.
The overall sentiment of the review is positive, leaning towards enthusiastic. While acknowledging some limitations due to the tool being in early development, the reviewer is clearly impressed by cofyt.app's ability to accurately interact with YouTube video content, finding it a useful and innovative tool. The reviewer enthusiastically recommends it to viewers and expresses excitement about its future development.
The reviewer states that cofyt.app is similar to Perplexity in design, making it familiar to users of that platform. (7:57-8:04) However, he also notes that cofyt.app lacks several features present in Perplexity, such as a spaces library and the ability to select an AI model. (1:30-1:42) He points out that unlike Perplexity, cofyt.app doesn't offer clickable follow-up questions. (3:50-3:58) Finally, he highlights that several UI elements in cofyt.app don't function, unlike in Perplexity. (8:06-8:16) Despite these limitations, he finds cofyt.app's ability to process video transcripts and answer questions comparable to Perplexity's accuracy. (5:03-5:15).