About this video

• Video Title: Типирование по соционике: Павел (Максим Горький, ЛСИ)
• Channel: Императивная соционика
• Speakers: Not specified in the transcript. The video features an interviewer and a subject named Pavel.
• Duration: 58:54

Overview

This video presents a Socionics typology analysis of an individual named Pavel. The analysis is conducted through a question-and-answer format, where Pavel's responses are examined for specific aspects and function model properties to determine his Socionics type, which is identified as Maxim Gorky (LSI).

Key takeaways

• The video employs a question-and-answer format for Socionics typing, analyzing each response for specific aspects and function model properties.
• Pavel is identified as the Socionics type Maxim Gorky (LSI).
• Pavel discusses his past work experience, hobbies, education, childhood, and views on society and health, providing insights into his personality and decision-making processes.
• The analysis highlights various Socionics aspects and functions within Pavel's responses, such as inert ethics, contact logic, white logic, black sensing, white intuition, black intuition, and black ethics.
• The video concludes by confirming Pavel's type as Maxim Gorky (LSI) based on the gathered information and Socionics models.

Table

The video explains its Socionics typing process as a question-and-answer format. After each answer from the respondent, the interviewer analyzes the information based on specific aspects. Based on how these aspects are expressed, they infer which properties of the function model A might be associated with them. By analyzing all the answers, they combine the identified function properties and aspects to determine the type. Finally, they translate these findings into the signs of a specific type. The video demonstrates this by breaking down Pavel's responses, identifying specific aspects like "inert ethics," "contact logic," "white logic," "black sensing," and others, and then mapping these to the characteristics of the Maxim Gorky (LSI) type.

Pavel's life and experiences, as described in the video, cover several key areas:

Work Experience:

• MaxiDom (Hypermarket for home and repair goods): He worked here as a sales consultant and found the job "absolutely not stressful." He was satisfied with the team and salary. The work involved restocking shelves, which required using a forklift for large deliveries, and customer service, which followed a specific algorithm: establishing contact, identifying needs, and offering suitable products.
• Current Situation: He is not currently working and is awaiting conscription into the army.
• Future Plans: He hopes to return to MaxiDom after his army service, as he enjoyed the team and the work environment.

Hobbies and Interests:

• Collecting Scale Models of Cars: This was a past hobby he no longer actively pursues.
• Guitars and Music: He has a project with a friend where they record covers of various songs.
• Socionics: He is interested in Socionics to understand himself and others better, believing it can help in understanding interactions and compatibility.
• Exploring Abandoned Places: He enjoys traveling to abandoned locations, including abandoned railways, often with a friend. He finds a certain atmosphere in these places that he likes.
• Long-Distance Walks: He once walked from Vsevolozhsk to St. Petersburg (approximately 20-25 km).
• Scientific Videos: He watches science-related content, particularly on topics like the brain and space.

Education:

• Polytechnic University: He initially applied to five universities and was accepted into the Institute of Mechanical Engineering, which later merged with the Polytechnic University.
• Specialty: His degree is in "Automation of Technological Processes and Complexes," with the potential role of an automation engineer for CNC machines.
• Experience: He found university learning easy but felt the knowledge was not practically applied and that many positions were held by experienced older individuals unwilling to cede them. He also noted that the program's curriculum changed frequently due to the university's mergers, leading to a diploma that was "100% water." He did not buy his diploma, unlike many of his classmates.

Childhood:

• He lived with his grandparents and father for a significant period.
• He recalls fond memories of playing with friends in a courtyard playground, though this playground no longer exists and has been replaced by something atmospherically different.
• He contrasts his childhood experiences (playing outside, getting dirty) with what he perceives as modern children's preferences for phones and computers, believing his own childhood was "cooler."
• He attended school from 1st to 9th grade, and then specialized in a technical track after 9th grade. He found some classmates in higher grades to be aggressive, which made him uncomfortable, as he dislikes bullying and sees it as deriving validation from weaker individuals.

Army Service:

• He is awaiting conscription into the army in the spring.
• He has no clear expectations about what army life will entail, as he finds it difficult to visualize or predict the experience, despite having seen related films or series. He anticipates a change of environment and new experiences.

Views on Society:

• Dislikes Traditionalism: He dislikes what he perceives as a move towards traditional values, such as rigid gender roles (men as providers, women as homemakers/mothers). He believes society is changing and that these traditional views are outdated.
• Critique of Modern Media/Awards: He is critical of what he sees as "tolerant criteria" in film awards like the Oscars, citing "Green Book" and "Moonlight" as examples where minority representation (black characters, LGBTQ+ themes) seems prioritized over other qualities. He also mentions the film "Captain Marvel" and the actress Brie Larson's perceived feminist stance, which he connects to negative audience reactions. He generally finds this trend "irritating."
• Politics: He finds the political situation in Russia confusing, with laws like those against insulting authorities and the pension age increase being particularly frustrating. He questions where taxes are going, as he perceives a disconnect between stated government initiatives and the reality on the ground, describing a general "devastation." He is critical of the focus on foreign policy over domestic issues.

Health:

• Gastritis: He has gastritis and is supposed to follow a diet but finds it difficult to give up "tasty things" like Big Macs and pizza. He admits to neglecting his health in this regard.
• Recognizing Illness: He can easily recognize early signs of a cold, such as exhaling warmer air or a tickling sensation in the throat. He usually takes medication for colds, which often helps.
• Serious Illnesses: He mentions having serious illnesses in childhood when his parents looked after him.
• Current Health: He states he doesn't get sick often now and hasn't had a high fever since around 2017. He feels generally well when not experiencing specific symptoms like stomach pain.
• Stomach Pain: He describes a specific feeling of discomfort when hungry, like the "upper walls of the stomach rubbing together with the rough side of a sponge." He finds lying on his stomach helps alleviate stomach pain.

The video delves into Socionics Aspects and Functions by using them as the primary lens through which Pavel's personality and way of thinking are analyzed. Here's a detailed breakdown:

Core Concept: The video operates on the principle that every spoken response can be broken down into manifestations of specific "aspects" (elements of information processing) and "functions" (how those aspects are used). These are organized within the "Model A," Socionics' model of the psyche.

The Typing Process:

1. Response Analysis: After Pavel gives an answer, the interviewer identifies which Socionics aspects are present in his statement.
2. Function Attribution: Based on how an aspect is expressed (e.g., its strength, how it's used, its valence – whether it's valued or unvalued), they infer which position it occupies in Model A.
3. Pattern Recognition: They look for patterns in how various aspects and functions are manifested. For example, if Pavel consistently describes concrete, tangible details and how things work in the physical world, this points to "sensing." If he focuses on the structure, logic, and efficiency of systems, this suggests "logic."
4. Model A Construction: By piecing together these observations, they build a picture of Pavel's Model A, identifying which functions are strong (valued, conscious) and which are weak (unvalued, unconscious, or in the "super-ego" or "demon" blocks).

Specific Aspects and Functions Mentioned for Pavel:

• White Logic (L - Ne): This appears to be a strong, valued function for Pavel. Evidence cited includes:

  • His detailed explanation of his past work at MaxiDom, including the technical processes involved (forklifts, pallets, logistics) and the customer service algorithm.
  • His analysis of the educational system, including how universities are structured, programs change, and the practical application (or lack thereof) of knowledge.
  • His breakdown of the pension system, calculating contributions and payouts, demonstrating a logical, systematic approach to understanding how things work.
  • His discussion of societal issues, analyzing policies and their perceived shortcomings.

• Black Sensing (S - Se): This is identified as a "loading" or "strong" aspect. Evidence includes:

  • His description of the physical tasks at MaxiDom (stocking shelves, handling goods).
  • His focus on concrete details when describing his environment or situations.

• Inert Ethics (Fi - not explicitly stated as inert, but ethical considerations are discussed): While "inert ethics" is mentioned in the summary, Pavel's discussions often lean towards logic. However, his reflections on relationships and social interactions, particularly his discomfort with bullying, suggest an engagement with ethical considerations. The interpretation is that his ethical processing might be more internal and less outwardly expressed, fitting an "inert" characteristic.

• Contact Logic (Te - not explicitly stated as contact, but logical reasoning is evident): His ability to articulate complex systems like the pension fund or work processes suggests a strong logical faculty. The interviewer connects his detailed, factual explanations to aspects of logic.

• White Intuition (Ni - not explicitly stated as white, but intuition is discussed):

  • His speculation on how his job absence might affect MaxiDom and who might fill his role.
  • His contemplation of alternative outcomes if he had chosen different jobs or educational paths.
  • His struggle to envision his army experience, indicating an awareness of possibilities but difficulty in concrete prediction.
  • His enjoyment of abandoned places and the "atmosphere of abandonment" could relate to sensing deeper, perhaps melancholic, qualities of a place.

• Black Intuition (Ne - not explicitly stated as black, but intuition is discussed):

  • His interest in Socionics as a way to understand different "types of thinking" and predict human behavior.
  • His exploration of various possibilities and scenarios, such as what might happen if he were stranded on a desert island.

• Black Ethics (Fe - not explicitly stated as black, but ethical considerations are present): His strong negative reaction to bullying and aggression in school suggests a sensitivity to the emotional atmosphere and social dynamics within groups. He clearly disapproves of behavior that harms others.

• White Sensorics (Si - not explicitly stated as white, but sensory comfort is discussed): His discussion of wanting his belongings to remain intact (e.g., not wanting a cat to scratch his bed) and his description of physical sensations (e.g., stomach pain) point to an awareness of the physical world and its comfort/discomfort.

• Inert Intuition (Ni): Mentioned in relation to his consideration of alternative job paths and how events might have unfolded differently.

• Static vs. Dynamic: The analysis notes "statica" (static) in his descriptions, suggesting a preference for understanding established systems and states rather than constant change or flux.

• Values:

  • White Ethics (Ve): The video suggests he values helping others and honesty, seeing these as crucial for respectful interactions.
  • White Logic (VL): His desire for truth and understanding, evident in his analysis of societal issues and Socionics.
  • Black Sensorics (BS): His focus on tangible reality and the resources available.
  • Black Ethics (Be): His aversion to aggression and bullying, and his appreciation for people who stand their ground with arguments.

Overall Interpretation: The analysis concludes that Pavel exhibits traits aligning with the Maxim Gorky (LSI) type. This is determined by synthesizing the identified strengths and weaknesses of his functions and aspects, which points to a combination including strong logical functions, a focus on the tangible world, and certain intuitive and ethical preferences that fit the LSI profile within Socionics theory. The video emphasizes that this is not just about listing traits but understanding how they interact within the structure of Model A.

The video presents Pavel's societal commentary through his responses to questions about his views on modern society, politics, and specific social issues. His commentary often reflects a critical and analytical perspective, highlighting what he perceives as inconsistencies, negative trends, or areas needing improvement.

Here are the key points of his societal commentary:

1. Dislike of Traditionalism and Rigid Gender Roles:

• Pavel expresses a strong aversion to what he calls "traditionalism" and a return to "traditional values."
• He specifically critiques traditional gender roles, where men are expected to be primary earners and providers ("work, earn money, get resources"), and women are expected to focus solely on domesticity and childcare ("mother, raise children").
• He argues that society has evolved beyond these roles, citing social and sexual revolutions, and that clinging to these outdated views is inappropriate for the current era.

2. Criticism of "Tolerant Criteria" in Media and Entertainment:

• Pavel is critical of what he perceives as a trend in modern entertainment, particularly film awards like the Oscars, where he believes films are nominated or win based on "tolerant criteria" rather than merit.
• He uses the examples of "Green Book" and "Moonlight" to illustrate this point, suggesting that the inclusion of minority characters (black protagonists) and themes related to non-traditional sexual orientations were key factors in their success, rather than purely artistic quality.
• He also references "Captain Marvel" and the actress Brie Larson's perceived feminist stance, linking it to negative audience reactions and rating drops, seeing it as another example of a "feminist" agenda influencing media.
• He finds this trend "irritating" and questions what message it conveys, suggesting it's an overemphasis on representation that might overshadow other aspects of filmmaking.

3. Frustration with Russian Politics and Governance:

• Pavel expresses significant dissatisfaction with the political situation in Russia.
• He describes the laws and policies as a "tightening of screws," specifically mentioning the law against "insulting authorities" and the pension age increase as examples.
• He questions the purpose and fairness of these actions, particularly the pension reform, and analyzes the logic of the pension fund system, highlighting what he sees as a flawed distribution model where individuals contribute for decades but may only receive a fraction back during their retirement.
• He voices skepticism about the government's effectiveness, asking "what are they going to do?" and observing that "nothing will be done."
• He criticizes the allocation of national resources, questioning why significant funds are spent on foreign policy ("aid in Syria," forgiving debt to Cuba) when he feels domestic issues like education, healthcare, and the welfare of citizens are neglected. He uses the phrase "let's help someone else" sarcastically.
• He points to Putin's "May decrees" regarding public sector salaries as an example of stated intentions not matching reality, claiming that promises are not being fulfilled and that there is "devastation" instead.

4. General Sentiment:

• His commentary often carries a tone of disillusionment and critical observation. He seems to value logic, fairness, and practical outcomes, and he points out where he sees these principles being violated or ignored in societal structures and trends.
• While he acknowledges the shift towards tolerance, he seems wary of what he perceives as its excesses or how it is being implemented, particularly in the entertainment industry.
• His political commentary is particularly strong, focusing on perceived government failures, lack of transparency, and misallocation of resources.

The video reveals details about Pavel's self-reflection and personal development through his answers about his past, his interests, and his views on himself and the world. Here's a breakdown:

1. Understanding Self and Others through Socionics:

• Pavel's stated interest in Socionics is primarily driven by a desire for self-understanding ("I want to understand who I am") and an interest in the concept of different types of thinking.
• He sees Socionics as a tool that can help him understand people better and predict how comfortable he might be interacting with them. This shows a proactive approach to personal development through learning about interpersonal dynamics.

2. Reflection on Past Choices and Experiences:

• Education: He reflects on his university experience, noting that he learned easily but felt the practical application of his degree was limited. He views his diploma as a formality rather than a testament to significant acquired skills, indicating a reflective understanding of the value and limitations of his formal education.
• Work: He found his previous job satisfactory but is now looking towards army service. His intention to return to his previous workplace post-service suggests a positive reflection on that experience and a desire for stability.
• Childhood: He looks back on his childhood with nostalgia, contrasting his own experiences with those of contemporary children. He identifies specific moments and aspects of his childhood (like the courtyard playground) that hold significance for him. He also reflects critically on the aggression he witnessed among peers in school, recognizing it as a negative behavior pattern.

3. Developing Social Skills and Comfort:

• Pavel explicitly states that his "normal socialization" began after finishing school in 2012.
• He used to have problems with communication but now feels comfortable in various group settings. This indicates a period of personal development focused on overcoming social anxieties and improving interpersonal skills.
• His appreciation for people who are "fun and communicative" and don't require words to be "pulled out of them" shows he values ease and openness in social interactions, likely reflecting his own growth in this area.

4. Processing Negative Experiences:

• His strong negative reaction to bullying ("I just don't understand why you just assert yourself at the expense of another, weaker person") demonstrates a developed ethical framework and a rejection of harmful social behaviors. This suggests he has reflected on and consciously decided against such actions.
• His critique of societal trends like rigid traditionalism or what he sees as forced inclusivity in media also indicates a process of forming and articulating his own values and perspectives, even if they are critical.

5. Coping with Uncertainty and Future Planning:

• Army Service: He admits to not knowing what to expect from the army, finding it difficult to visualize. However, he anticipates a change of environment and new experiences, suggesting an openness to the unknown, even if he can't predict specifics.
• Health: He acknowledges his tendency to neglect his health (e.g., diet) due to a preference for enjoyable foods. This shows self-awareness of a personal challenge and a struggle between desire and health maintenance. He also reflects on how he recognizes illness signs, indicating a practical awareness of his body.
• Risk Assessment: While not overly cautious, he describes a situational awareness where he becomes more vigilant in "hostile atmospheres." This suggests a learned behavior for managing potentially risky environments, rather than a constant state of fear.

6. Introspection on Values:

• He values honesty and is willing to hear unpleasant truths if they are delivered genuinely, believing it's better than concealment.
• He respects people who are ready to help and invest their time and resources in others.
• He values individuals who can articulate and defend their viewpoints with arguments.

In essence, Pavel's narrative portrays a journey of personal development marked by a growing understanding of himself and others, improved social comfort, the formation of critical perspectives on society, and a developing awareness of his own habits and their consequences.