This video is a recording of a past stream where the hosts of the Императивная соционика channel type Andrey Bozhko, a known figure in the "Socionics of Elements" community. The video uses a format that intersperses interview excerpts with the hosts' commentary and reactions to viewer comments. The goal is to determine Bozhko's sociotype.
The video analyzes Andrey Bozhko's socionics type through an interview and audience interaction. Here's a step-by-step breakdown of the topics and points addressed:
Introduction (0:01-0:46): The hosts introduce the video as a recording of a previous stream focusing on typing Andrey Bozhko. They mention a previous typing video on their channel and explain the video's format.
First Interview Segment (0:46-1:08): A short introductory segment of the interview with Andrey Bozhko begins.
First Commentary Segment (1:08-1:16): The hosts begin their initial analysis of the interview excerpt, discussing initial impressions and focusing on Bozhko's communication style.
Second Interview Segment (1:16-1:21): A second interview excerpt is shown.
Second Commentary Segment (1:21-1:27): The hosts continue their analysis, noting Bozhko's difficulty answering questions about himself and speculating about his functions.
Third Interview Segment (1:27-2:22): A longer interview segment shows Bozhko discussing his past experiences, education (history), and interest in psychology and esotericism, his transition to becoming a tour guide, and his current activities.
Third Commentary Segment (2:22-8:09): The hosts analyze this segment, focusing on Bozhko's narrative style, his lack of self-evaluation, and his discussion of his work and hobbies. They discuss the possibility of inert logic. They analyze viewer comments suggesting inert logic.
Fourth Interview Segment (8:09-8:55): Another interview excerpt focusing on Bozhko's desires and aspirations.
Fourth Commentary Segment (8:55-14:25): The hosts discuss Bozhko's stated desires, linking them to possible socionics functions. They discuss the possibility of black sensing and white intuition. The concept of "uniqueness" in typing is addressed.
Fifth Interview Segment (14:25-15:51): An interview segment where Bozhko discusses his favorite characters and what inspires him.
Fifth Commentary Segment (15:51-17:40): The hosts analyze this segment focusing on how Bozhko conveys information through storytelling and actions. They touch upon his artistic and expressive nature, linking it to potential socionics types. Discussion about whether he is a 3rd or 4th quadra type.
Sixth Interview Segment (17:40-18:33): A short segment of the interview concerning Bozhko's passion for painting.
Sixth Commentary Segment (18:33-22:11): The hosts comment on the interview segment about painting, focusing on his deep immersion in the process and how this relates to his socionics type. They discuss the possibility of different subtypes and compare him to Lesya (from a previous typing).
Seventh Interview Segment (22:11-23:32): A segment where Bozhko speaks on his interests in various media (psychology, scientific documentaries, art).
Seventh Commentary Segment (23:32-28:05): The hosts continue the analysis, focusing on the breadth of Bozhko’s interests and the consistency in his communication style.
Eighth Interview Segment (28:05-29:15): A shorter interview segment.
Eighth Commentary Segment (29:15-31:44): The hosts summarize their findings and further discuss potential types, focusing on the logic and ethics functions.
Ninth Interview Segment (31:44-36:16): Interview about Bozhko’s favorite fictional characters and why they are influential.
Ninth Commentary Segment (36:16-38:58): Hosts discuss Bozhko’s choices and their significance within the context of socionics.
Tenth Interview Segment (38:58-40:12): A segment discussing what aspects of society bother him.
Tenth Commentary Segment (40:12-46:56): This segment heavily involves viewer comments and discussion. They analyse his responses concerning societal issues, relating them to his potential socionics functions. The debate about his type continues, exploring several possibilities and incorporating viewer input. The possibility of a болевая (pain) function is discussed.
Eleventh Interview Segment (46:56-49:07): A segment discussing the question of an "island" scenario (a common socionics thought experiment).
Eleventh Commentary Segment (49:07-52:31): Hosts discuss Bozhko’s "island" response, focusing on the organization and leadership aspects, and how it relates to his potential socionics type.
Twelfth Interview Segment (52:31-55:32): Another segment discussing the hypothetical island.
Twelfth Commentary Segment (55:32-59:54): The hosts and viewers debate the implications of Bozhko’s island response, continuing the analysis of his potential type. The use of the term "loaded" function is discussed.
Thirteenth Interview Segment (59:54-1:03:27): Interview about what Bozhko would do if his financial situation were resolved.
Thirteenth Commentary Segment (1:03:27-1:04:24): Hosts’ analysis of the previous interview, further refining potential types.
Fourteenth Interview Segment (1:04:24-1:06:19): A segment discussing his experience working with others, specifically how he responds to receiving criticism.
Fourteenth Commentary Segment (1:06:19-1:07:33): Further analysis incorporating comments from the audience. A discussion about the nature of dynamic vs. static in his personality.
Fifteenth Interview Segment (1:07:33-1:15:23): An interview segment discussing his two main professional activities.
Fifteenth Commentary Segment (1:15:23-1:16:25): Analysis focused on what Bozhko enjoys and dislikes about his work.
Sixteenth Interview Segment (1:16:25-1:18:04): A shorter interview segment.
Sixteenth Commentary Segment (1:18:04-1:19:57): More audience discussion and further analysis of Bozhko’s type. The hosts discuss the challenges of maintaining consistency in socionics interpretations.
Seventeenth Interview Segment (1:19:57-1:21:23): A final interview segment.
Seventeenth Commentary Segment (1:21:23-1:24:45): Hosts summarise the discussion, offering a final perspective on Bozhko’s type and addressing various points of discussion. The topic of "loaded" functions is discussed.
Eighteenth Interview Segment (1:24:45-1:26:14): A very short final interview segment.
Eighteenth Commentary Segment (1:26:14-1:27:47): Further audience interaction and summary of the typing process.
Nineteenth Interview Segment (1:27:47-1:28:07): Another brief interview segment.
Nineteenth Commentary Segment (1:28:07-1:32:09): The discussion continues, with the hosts considering various aspects of Bozhko's communication style, values, and his professional activities. They still try to resolve the static vs. dynamic debate and explain what he finds frustrating in his work.
Twentieth Interview Segment (1:32:09-1:33:00): A short segment discussing what frustrates him about people.
Twentieth Commentary Segment (1:33:00-1:37:42): The hosts continue to analyze what frustrates Bozhko and relates it to his potential socionics type, explaining that what frustrates him is largely a reflection of his own personality.
Twenty-first Interview Segment (1:37:42-1:39:23): A brief segment about his opinion on the way different Socionics communities work.
Twenty-first Commentary Segment (1:39:23-1:41:38): More audience interaction and speculation on Bozhko’s type.
Twenty-second Interview Segment (1:41:38-1:42:29): A short interview segment.
Twenty-second Commentary Segment (1:42:29-1:43:34): More discussion, summarizing the main points of contention and resolving some lingering questions.
Twenty-third Interview Segment (1:43:34-1:46:41): Interview about aspects he enjoys about his work.
Twenty-third Commentary Segment (1:46:41-1:48:17): Analysis of the interview and summary of the points discussed during this final portion of the stream.
Twenty-fourth Interview Segment (1:48:17-1:50:46): An interview about what he finds difficult in his work.
Twenty-fourth Commentary Segment (1:50:46-1:52:40): Further discussion and analysis of Bozhko’s communication style, and the challenges he faces in his work. The hosts continue to debate among themselves and the chat.
Twenty-fifth Interview Segment (1:52:40-1:54:38): A short interview segment about his friends.
Twenty-fifth Commentary Segment (1:54:38-1:57:39): The discussion continues, with a focus on Bozhko's relationships and how his communication style contributes to his potential socionics type.
Twenty-sixth Interview Segment (1:57:39-1:58:07): Another short interview segment.
Twenty-sixth Commentary Segment (1:58:07-2:02:41): Hosts’ discussion about what they have noticed concerning his communication style and how his responses relate to his potential type.
Twenty-seventh Interview Segment (2:02:41-2:03:01): A very brief interview segment.
Twenty-seventh Commentary Segment (2:03:01-2:05:46): The hosts make their final conclusions on Bozhko's type, summarizing their reasoning and highlighting the main points that support their decision.
Conclusion (2:05:46-2:13:17): The hosts conclude the video, reviewing the key findings of the typing process, addressing some final questions from the chat, and closing remarks.
In the twenty-seventh commentary segment (2:03:01-2:05:46), the hosts arrive at their final conclusion that Andrey Bozhko's socionics type is Jack London. They summarize their reasoning with these key points:
Bozhko's communication style: They reiterate that Bozhko's communication style consistently shows inert black logic and an emphasis on storytelling and describing processes rather than offering direct evaluations. This lack of self-evaluation and focus on objective descriptions point toward the Jack London type.
Bozhko's values and priorities: His deep-seated values regarding non-violence, promoting understanding between people, and his dedication to his work (both socionics and his tours) all align with the typical values associated with Jack London.
Focus on Processes and Systems: Bozhko's detailed descriptions of his work, his detailed explanation of how he approaches tasks and projects, and his focus on systems (like his organization of tours and his approach to socionics) further support the Jack London typing.
Inert Logic and Dynamic Traits: The hosts reconcile the apparent presence of inert logic with Bozhko's dynamic, creative, and energetic personality. This is achieved by referencing the nuances within the Jack London type and how its functions manifest.
Contrast with Lesya: A comparison is made between Bozhko and Lesya (from a previous typing video), emphasizing that while both were originally suspected to be similar types, differences in communication style and expressed values led the hosts to conclude Bozhko is ultimately different.
In essence, the final conclusion isn't based on a single decisive factor, but rather a confluence of observations related to his communication style, values, professional activities, and a comparison to a previously typed individual. The hosts stress the importance of looking at the totality of the information provided.
The conclusion (2:05:46-2:13:17) wraps up the video with these key points:
Reiteration of Jack London Typing: The hosts restate their conclusion that Andrey Bozhko's sociotype is Jack London. They briefly summarize the key arguments supporting this conclusion, emphasizing the consistency of his communication style and the alignment of his values and priorities with the Jack London profile.
Addressing Viewer Questions and Comments: The hosts address various questions and comments from the live chat, clarifying points of confusion or disagreement that arose during the typing process. Specific questions addressed relate to the nuances of socionics typing, the interpretation of certain functions, and the differentiation of Bozhko's type from other similar types.
Discussion of Static vs. Dynamic: The ongoing debate about Bozhko exhibiting static or dynamic traits is revisited, explaining how aspects of his personality can be interpreted within the Jack London type's functional stack.
Comparison with Lesya: The comparison with Lesya from a previous video is revisited and the differences in their communication styles are emphasized. This highlights the process of differentiating between seemingly similar types within socionics.
The Difficulty of Socionics Typing: The hosts acknowledge the inherent complexities of socionics typing and that arriving at a definitive conclusion often involves a process of elimination and careful consideration of multiple factors.
Closing Remarks and Call to Action: The hosts thank viewers for watching and encourage them to share their own thoughts and opinions on the typing in the comments. They also promote other content on their channel.
In short, this section serves to consolidate the findings, clarify any remaining uncertainties, and conclude the typing process while acknowledging the subjective nature of socionics and encouraging further discussion.
