What Happened to American Conservatism? — with David Brooks | Prof G Conversations

About this Video

• Video Title: What Happened to American Conservatism? — with David Brooks | Prof G Conversations
• Channel: The Prof G Pod – Scott Galloway
• Speakers: Scott Galloway, David Brooks
• Duration: 00:49:08

Introduction

This conversation between Scott Galloway and David Brooks explores the state of American conservatism. Brooks reflects on the evolution of conservatism, its current state, and the factors contributing to its perceived harshness. The discussion also touches upon the roles of higher education, national service, and the influence of money in shaping American society and its political landscape.

Key Takeaways

• Shift in Conservatism: David Brooks observes a significant shift in conservatism, moving away from traditional values towards a focus on dominance and rage. He differentiates between "pro-conservative" and "anti-left" stances, arguing that the latter prioritizes opposition to the left over conservative principles.
• Role of Resentment: Resentment and a siege mentality are identified as key factors contributing to the perceived meanness of the contemporary right. Brooks connects this to a deeper, animistic aspect of human nature and the erosion of civilizational values.
• Loss of National Honor: The conversation explores the sense of moral shame and loss of national honor following the Trump administration, contrasting previous administrations' flaws with the perceived malice within the Trump presidency.
• Critique of Progressivism: Brooks critiques certain aspects of progressivism, including its focus on identity politics and the creation of exclusionary environments within universities and media, which he argues contributed to the backlash from the right.
• Solutions for Social and Relational Crisis: Brooks suggests several potential solutions, including redirecting resources to left-behind communities, fostering community leadership, teaching practical social skills, and promoting moral formation within various societal institutions. He emphasizes the need for a broader definition of ability in higher education and calls for universities to rediscover their civic mission.